Government Should Not Operate Like Tech Company

Published On:
Government Should Not Operate Like Tech Company

The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is facing mounting criticism for its aggressive cost-cutting measures, including attempts to slash federal research funding.

The University of Michigan has raised alarms over proposed cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which would eliminate three-quarters of a billion dollars in funding for research at the university alone.

While a federal judge has temporarily blocked the budget cuts, concerns are growing about DOGE’s “tech startup” approach to governance and the long-term consequences for public services, scientific research, and consumer protections.

What is DOGE Doing?

Major Actions by DOGE So Far:

  • Dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and merged it into the State Department.
  • Terminated contracts across multiple federal agencies.
  • Paralyzed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
  • Plans to overhaul the Department of Education, IRS, and NASA.

Critics warn that these cuts will reduce essential services, affecting:

  • Medical research & healthcare funding
  • Consumer protections
  • Federal workforce stability

North Carolina Congresswoman Alma Adams on DOGE’s Cuts:

“They’re going to impact families. It’s going to impact our schools. It’s going to impact our veterans, our nursing homes.”

Is Musk Treating Government Like a Tech Company?

DOGE’s “move fast and break things” mentality mirrors Musk’s management style at X (formerly Twitter). After acquiring the platform, he:

  • Fired most of the workforce to cut costs.
  • Implemented rapid, sweeping policy changes that led to technical issues.
  • Saw X lose 80% of its value since his takeover.

Applying the same strategy to the federal government is proving problematic, as:

  • Cuts are being made without understanding long-term impacts.
  • Many DOGE hires lack experience in federal budgeting and management.
  • Federal funding serves crucial functions that cannot be instantly “fixed” like software bugs.

Government ≠ A Business

Unlike tech companies, the government cannot function with rapid, untested cuts due to:

  • Checks and balances that prevent unilateral action.
  • Long-term funding commitments that impact millions of lives.
  • The complexity of federal programs, which require expert oversight.

Why Are DOGE’s Cuts Dangerous?

NIH Budget Cuts Could Halt Life-Saving Research

  • Freezing NIH funds has previously caused medical research delays and even deaths.
  • Lack of funding threatens breakthroughs in cancer, Alzheimer’s, and infectious diseases.

Musk’s Inexperienced Staff is Mismanaging the Process

  • Many DOGE hires are from the tech sector, with little to no government experience.
  • Some employees are teenagers with controversial backgrounds, including past racist social media posts.
  • Experts fear DOGE’s “efficiency-first” focus is actually leading to mismanagement and waste.

DOGE’s $1 Trillion Deficit Reduction Goal is Unrealistic

  • Slashing contracts and laying off workers will not eliminate the deficit.
  • Reckless cuts could destabilize essential government programs.

The Dangers of DOGE’s Mindset:

“When Musk implemented drastic cost-cutting at X, it caused major disruptions. The same mistakes are now being repeated on a much larger scale—with real lives at stake.”

Source

Jaxon

Alberto Bufalino ('22) is from Durham, North Carolina, and is studying Political and International Affairs. He is the Managing Editor of the Wake Forest Review.

Leave a Comment