Under Pennsylvania law and federal precedent, flipping off a police officer is protected speech under the First Amendment and not inherently illegal. However, interactions may escalate depending on an officer’s discretion and context. Here’s a detailed overview:
Legal Protections for Offensive Gestures
- First Amendment Rights:
- Courts have consistently ruled that flipping off a cop is protected speech, even if offensive. For example:
- Brockway v. Shepherd (Federal District Court in Pennsylvania): Flipping the bird lacks inherent sexual connotations required for obscenity charges under Pennsylvania’s disorderly conduct law.
- Cruise-Gulyas v. Minard (6th Circuit): A driver’s middle finger directed at an officer is protected expression, and retaliatory stops violate the First Amendment.
- The ACLU has successfully challenged citations for this gesture, such as in Hackbart v. City of Pittsburgh, where charges were dropped.
- Courts have consistently ruled that flipping off a cop is protected speech, even if offensive. For example:
- Disorderly Conduct Claims:
- Pennsylvania’s disorderly conduct statute (18 Pa.C.S. § 5503) requires speech to incite “public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm” and be obscene. Courts narrowly define “obscene” as involving sexual content, which flipping off does not.
- Mere rudeness or frustration, even toward police, is insufficient for charges.
Risks and Practical Considerations
- Retaliatory Enforcement:
- While the gesture itself is legal, officers may retaliate by:
- Issuing pretextual citations (e.g., tinted windows, expired tags).
- Extending stops to search for other violations under Pennsylvania v. Mimms.
- Example: A New Milford, NJ, officer cited a driver for disorderly conduct after being flipped off, but prosecutors dismissed the charge.
- While the gesture itself is legal, officers may retaliate by:
- Temporary Detention:
- Officers might detain individuals briefly, but courts have ruled such retaliatory stops unconstitutional.
Key Court Precedents
- Federal Appeals Court Ruling (6th Circuit):
Retaliatory traffic stops for flipping off cops violate the First and Fourth Amendments. Officers cannot escalate stops solely due to hurt feelings. - ACLU Victories:
Multiple cases, including Hackbart and Martin, confirm that citations for flipping off officers are unconstitutional.
Recommendations
- Know Your Rights:
- Politely decline to engage if questioned about the gesture.
- Record interactions if possible (Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state, so inform the officer).
- Avoid Escalation:
- While legal, antagonizing officers risks prolonged interaction or pretextual charges.
- Legal Recourse:
- If cited or arrested, challenge the charge under First Amendment grounds. Most cases are dismissed or settled.
Exceptions
- Contempt of Court: Flipping off a judge in court may result in contempt charges.
- Accompanying Threats/Conduct: Combining the gesture with threats, obstruction, or violence can lead to charges like harassment or assault.
Bottom Line: Flipping off a cop in Pennsylvania is legally protected speech, but exercise caution to avoid confrontations. If wrongfully cited, consult an attorney to assert your First Amendment rights.
Sources:
- https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/do-you-have-the-right-to-flip-off-cops/
- https://www.performance-protocol.com/post/is-it-illegal-to-flip-off-a-cop-examining-the-legal-and-social-implications
- https://www.aclu-nj.org/en/press-releases/free-speech-victory-man-who-flipped-cop-unmarked-car
- https://www.mystatecollegelawyer.com/2015/01/is-flipping-the-bird-illegal-in-pennsylvania/
- https://www.marcushillattorney.com/links/flipping-off-the-cops.shtml